• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Otto Laske Interdevelopmental Institute (IDM)

Creating Collaborative Intelligence

Otto Laske Interdevelopmental Institute (IDM)

Creating Collaborative Intelligence

  • Home
  • The IDM Approach
    • DDO: The Deliberately Developmental Organization Is Coming
    • The Constructive Developmental Framework
    • The Dialectical Thought Form Framework (DTF)
  • IDM Services
  • IDM Publications
  • Otto Laske
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact

Workshops

A Description of IDM’s Program For Acquiring Fluency in Using CDF Tools

February 23, 2022 By Otto Laske Leave a Comment

The IDM program that leads to fluency in the use of CDF tools, now 20 years old, has unusual features that set them apart from other professional offerings. Among these features are: (1) professional learning closely linked to personal self-development, (2) comprehensive introduction into developmental and dialectical thinking, (3) exercises set in social contexts that make it easy to transfer them to professional practice, (4) teaching CDF tools in a social-ontology framework that opens participants’ eyes to the social and cultural constraints they encounter in launching life and work projects, (5) unremitting modeling of developmental and dialectical practice in all workshop sessions in which participants enable and coach each other at a high level of awareness of their own internal conversations.

For more details, see the description below:

Description of IDM’s CDF Program

Filed Under: Articles by Otto Laske, CDF Mentoring, Collaborative Intelligence, Consulting, Consulting to Executives, Culture Critique, Developmental Coaching, Dialectical Thinking, Distributed leadership, integral thinking, Social Ontology, Team Development, Workshops Tagged With: CDF, DTF, Otto Laske, Team Development

Toward a Critical Realist Management and Consulting Framework Based on CDF

May 5, 2021 By Otto Laske Leave a Comment

In this article, Otto Laske emphasizes the lack of a social ontology in present managerial and consultative thinking. Such a discipline helps social and cultural actors understand the antecedent social and cultural structures their concerns and projects are embedded in, as well as strengthen the likelihood that executing their projects will come as close as possible to the intended organizational and social results they are envisioning. Social ontology, deriving from R. Bhaskar’s and M. Archer’s work since 1980, offers managers a sense of place from which to view their meaning- and sense-making stance, not just their perceptions, from an objective place. More than that: it helps them understand “where they are positioned when they open their mouth to speak” and listen to others.

In contrast to empiricist frameworks of individual decision- making (like the Cynefin model), a social-ontology (SO) framework treats decision-making as a response of social actors to antecedent social and cultural structures they are unaware of as determinants of their project designs. Decision-making is seen as derivative of project design which in turn is conceived of as rooted in concerns linked to vested interests associated with roles in a social role matrix that is open to change by role incumbents. Rather than viewing decision-making as a starting point of adaptive functioning, such a framework treats it as the endpoint of a more or less successful journey toward understanding antecedent social and organizational constraints and enablements that human projects inevitably encounter.

Importantly, in an SO framework roles are not assigned or taken but created through a team dialogue based on complex, dialectical thinking practiced by all participants, although at different levels of cognitive development over the life span. It is the goal of real-time dialogue to witness and document that people at different levels of cognitive development conceive of social situations differently, as well as more or less adequately attuned to how they structure decision-making situations in the first place. Decision-making is seen as the origin of intended, as well as unforeseeable unintended, consequences that may run counter to the project design the decisions made sprang from.

Within an SO framework, navigating the vagaries of complex and chaotic situations is a three-phase process:

  • Phase 1: Understand the social and cultural antecedents of situations encountered which provoke project design and invite decision-making according to it.
  • Phase 2: Design and implement projects in response to such antecedents so that decisions made in executing projects are ‘in tune’ with such antecedents.
  • Phase 3: Make sure that the organizational and social structures resulting from project execution are optimally intended rather than unintended, to avoid the reproduction of, rather than achieving a transformation of, the social and cultural antecedents initially encountered.

The author sees the reason for the absence of social ontology thinking in the predominantly empiricist orientation of managers’ and consultants’ thinking for whom ‘perception’, ‘experiences’ and ‘data’ are the loadstars of their methodology  As a result, they are committing the ‘epistemic fallacy’ of reducing social reality to thought, mostly in the form of iron-clad logical models. However, social reality is not a bundle of experiences and actualities as they presume. Its enduring structures are emergent properties that are formed by social actors’ response to antecedent social and cultural structures which co-define their internal conversations about projects. Needed therefore is a re-education of both managers and consultants in the direction of becoming aware of the benefits of thinking twice, namely ontologically, that is, in terms of a pre-existing social reality they are embedded in and are responding to without being aware of it. Ontological awareness is strongly enabled by DTF, the Dialectical Thought Form Framework, that is modeled after R. Bhaskar’s Four Moments of Dialectic.

In sum: the absence from managers’ and consultants’ thinking of both adult development and social ontology (which is centered around human agency, and thus adult development) defines the double burden of their social mandate.

The article below points to a first Social Ontology Practicum that was designed to pave the way toward better informed management and consultancy thinking, and carried out in the fall of 2020 and the spring of 2021 at the Interdevelopmental Institute based on DTF.

Toward a Critical Realist Management and Consulting Framework

Filed Under: Articles by Otto Laske, Dialectical Thinking, Distance Learning Course, integral thinking, meta-thinking, Workshops Tagged With: CDF, Cognitive Dimension, Dialectical Thinking, DTF, Thought Forms

Steps Toward Developing a Dialectical Thinking Practice: The Structure of the IDM Dialectics Practicum

November 8, 2020 By Otto Laske Leave a Comment

The way we encounter the world is anchored in our ways of attending to it. They not only change the relationship we have to the world we unceasingly construct; they also fundamentally determine the world we encounter. Thinking in language when untutored in dialectical linking puts us under the control of left-hemisphere, logical, thinking, — a mode of being now rampant that constrains the quality of our life and creative work. For this reason, we are in need of re-socializing ourselves through building up in our mind new ways of listening, speaking, writing, ‘thinking’, reading, communicating, coaching, and facilitating.

To further re-socialization in adults, IDM is launching 5-months long practica of dialectical thinking.  The next Practicum starts at the end of November 2020. For details, see https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563 and https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7641.

Since nobody can learn news ways of being from books but only through supervised practice, IDM Practica are structured in terms of a sequence of activities carried out by members of small cohorts of 4-6 participants mentored by Otto Laske, originator of the Dialectical Thought Form Framework. Have a look at the structure of the Practicum at the first link below and learn about the correspondence of Practicum Activities and Learning Targets at the second link.

Structure Proposal for Dialectics Practicum

Correspondence of Learning Activities & Targets

For viewing the Jaamzin Special Edition of Otto Laske’s dialectics-based visual artwork, go to https://issuu.com/jaamzin/docs/otto_laske. You can place an order for a copy of the print edition by transferring $35 at smediazin@gmail.com via Paypal (which includes shipping to you from an Amsterdam printer).

For additional information on the structure and flow of the Practicum, go to:

From “Organizational Development” to Self-Development: An Insiders’ View of the IDM Dialectical Thinking Practicum

An Intense Five-Month Practicum in Dialectical Thinking

 

Filed Under: Articles by Otto Laske, CDF Mentoring, Cognitive Dimension, Collaborative Intelligence, Consulting, Culture Critique, Developmental Coaching, Dialectical Thinking, Distance Learning Course, meta-thinking, Uncategorized, Workshops Tagged With: Cognitive Dimension, Deep Thinking, Dialectical Thinking, DTF, Otto Laske, Thought Forms

From “Organizational Development” to Self-Development: An Insiders’ View of the IDM Dialectical Thinking Practicum

October 25, 2020 By Otto Laske Leave a Comment

Self-development, in capitalistic society a mere appendix of professional education for the sake of playing an organizational role, is increasingly making a comeback as a personal goal. This come-back seemed out of the question until recently, being an outcome of attempts to consciously reverse the demise of liberal education by which universities reduced themselves to trade schools and job preparation camps. The factors involved in the re-emergence of me-first education are many, including the pandemic’s destruction of the conventional work world and gains in the social media/AI link. While still acknowledged only half-heartedly as to their importance, these factors together form the springboard from which new self-developmental curricula will emerge. Job and role holders, whose skills’ half-life is shrinking by the day, are gradually realizing that managerially supported schemes of self-development are ploys intent on hindering taking full responsibility for one’s own development in the normative sense of adult development.

Research at the Interdevelopmental Institute (IDM) since 2000, as well as the Institute’s teaching practice of “develop yourself first” have made visible the deep interweaving of emotional and intellectual maturity, referred to in its Constructive Developmental Framework (CDF) as the interleaving of social-emotional and cognitive levels of adult development. That research has also shown that role holder’s psychological profile — in the corporate world often the exclusive focus of behavioral job interventions, as well as of coaching and training — is only a lesser ingredient of a person’s inter-culturally valid adult-developmental profile.

While books are still being written about “professional education” and “job education”, often with the goal of enhancing fluidity of thinking and taking responsibility for one’s assigned organizational role in terms of ‘competences’, for nearly two decades IDM has educated individuals with foremost attention paid to the learner him- or herself and attention to their clients and their goals a far second. The raison d’être of this approach is the insight that being of help to others is one of the most difficult accomplishment achievable since a person can be of help to others (as well as him- or herself) only to the degree that s(he) is presently developed both emotionally and cognitively.

Putting the client or the team first has long been seen at IDM as a (Kegan Level 3) subterfuge meant to aid avoiding to address one’s own development realistically and head-on first and independently. At IDM, managerial topics such as “employee learning and development” have long been suspected of being a trap into which to fall is too costly for an individual in terms of his/her own mental growth as a person. Equally, the much-touted notion of enhancing problem solving has been suspected of being just another subterfuge to evade self-development since “problems” to be solved institutionally always come already packaged in terms of an un-reflected world view that makes them unsolvable from the start, especially if they have become institutionalized as our problems “understood by all”.

Having sprung from the conviction that every individual composes his or her own unique ‘world’, IDM abides by its mission to put self-development first, and consider all other “development” as a far second and a lesser transformation. In this context, have a look at its current Practicum offering, described at https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563, meant to assist participants revolutionize the internal dialogue by which they construct their own real world as something “in here” (in my own internal world), rather than submitting to the illusion that their real world is an “object out there” they have no alternative but to accept.

The focus of pedagogical and developmental attention on the “in here” of world construction follows the insight that the real world shows up for everybody exactly in terms of what a person presently manages to grasp cognitively and is able to experience social-emotionally, in an intense interpenetration of ‘how I feel about the world’ and ‘what I presently manage to understand about the world’.

That is why Practicum topics such as learning to attend to:

  • the thought form structure of what is said by others
  • the level of meaning making from which something is spoken (told, interpreted, obfuscated, etc.)
  • how one responsibly formulates a thought or question in real time dialogue
  • how one gives feedback to a loved-one, colleague, or client
  • how one becomes able to help another person reach a higher level of self-awareness

are equally of existential and professional relevance.

The Practicum described at https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563 is shaped by all participants, not the instructor alone who is playing the role of mentor and challenger who himself is open to be challenged in unforeseen ways.

The Practicum requires taking initiative regarding one’s own self-development in such a way as to equally honor others’ self-development and the level at which it presently stands. “We are all in the same adult-developmental boat together” is the motto. The Practicum’s curriculum comprises mastering the following set of dialectical tools, by working with thought forms in sober Bauhaus fashion:

  • dialogical listening tools
  • dialogue analysis tools, including tools for analyzing one’s internal dialogue
  • question and challenge generators
  • tools for broadening a conceptual field (including in an inquiry into one’s own emotional ‘inner’ world)
  • tools for finding/imagining alternatives to escape TINA (‘there is no alternative’) configurations
  • tools for understanding the implications and absences of a text, news story, biographical reflection
  • tools for redesigning policy scenarios in institutions and think-tanks
  • holistic causality tools
  • tools for following one’s own movements-in-thought in an untrammeled way
  • tools for a creative disregard of established conventions in one’s work, office, art studio, and writing practice
  • tools for understanding and analyzing one’s own and others’ creative work, including art work.

For further details on mastering dialectical thinking, go to https://interdevelopmentals.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Laske-Introduction-to-the-DTF-Manual-final-version-1.pdf

Inquiries based on this and the previous blog (https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563) to otto@interdevelopmentals.org are welcome.

 

Filed Under: Articles by Otto Laske, CDF Mentoring, Cognitive Dimension, Courses, Culture Critique, Dialectical Thinking, Distance Learning Course, education, meta-thinking, Nature of Work, Uncategorized, Workshops Tagged With: CDF, DTF, Otto Laske, Thought Forms

An Intense Five-Month Practicum in Dialectical Thinking

October 12, 2020 By Otto Laske Leave a Comment

Increasingly, the issues on which the survival of our civilization depends are ‘wicked’ in the sense of being more complex than logical thinking alone can make sense of and deal with. Needed is not only systemic and holistic but dialectical thinking to achieve critical realism. Dialectical thinking has a long tradition both in Western and Eastern philosophy but, although renewed through the Frankfurt School and more recently Roy Bhaskar, has not yet begun to penetrate cultural discourse in a practically effective way. We can observe the absence of dialectical thinking in daily life as much as in the scientific and philosophical literature.

To begin to change this situation, Otto Laske, who comes from the Frankfurt School and has renewed dialectical thinking in Measuring Hidden Dimensions of Human Systems (2008) and Dialectical Thinking for Integral Leaders: A Primer (2015), is offering an intense practicum for thinkers and members of think tanks inside and outside of organizations, as well as members of organizations and consultants. He is using a mentoring approach in which mentees take responsibility for each other’s work as in an organizational team, offering a safe and open space in which practical as well as visionary people can come together to tackle issues of common concern that require a re-thinking of problem foundations using DTF, the Dialectical Thought Form Framework he has taught since 2000.

It is one of the benefits of the practicum to let participants viscerally experience that, and in what way, logical thinking — although a prerequisite of dialectical thinking — is potentially also the greatest hindrance to dialectical thinking because of its lack of a concept of negativity. To speak with Roy Bhaskar, dialectical thinking requires “thinking the coincidence of distinctions” that logical thinking is so good at making, being characterized by “fluidity around the hard core of absence” (that is, negativity, or what is missing or not yet there).

For thinkers unaware of the limitations of logical thinking, dialectical thinking is a many-faced beast which to tame requires building up in oneself new modes of listening, analysis, self- and other-reflection, the ability to generate thought-form based questions, and making explicit what is implicit or absent in a person’s or group’s real-time thinking. These components are best apprehended and exercised in dialogue with members of a group led by a DTF-schooled mentor/facilitator.

The complex thinking exercised in this practicum is beneficial far beyond those working in or for organizations. A wide range of professionals including members of think tanks, politicians, interdisciplinary researchers, graduate level educators, psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, social workers, life and executive coaches, and theologians equally benefit from going beyond mere logic-bounded systems thinking.

The practicum takes the following six-prong approach:

 

  Learning Targets Associated Activities
1 Foundations of Dialectic Understand moments of dialectic and classes of thought forms and their intrinsic linkages as the underpinnings of a theory of knowledge
2 Structured dialogue and communication Learn how to use moments of dialectic when trying to understand a speaker’s subject matter and issues, or when aiming to speak or writing clearly
3 (Developmental) listening and self-reflection Learn to reflect on the thought form structure of what is being said by a person or an entire group in real time
4 Text analysis Learn to understand the conceptual structure of a text (incl. an interview text) in terms of moments of dialectic and their associated thought forms as indicators of optimal thought complexity
5 Question & problem generation and formulation Learn how to formulate cogent and visionary questions (including to yourself), and give feedback based on moments of dialectic and their associated thought forms
6 Critical facilitation Learn how to assist others in understanding what they are un-reflectedly saying, thinking, or intending

Acquiring these six, mutually supportive capabilities takes time and patience with oneself and others. It goes far beyond ‘skill training’ since participants need to engage in revolutionizing their listening, way of thinking, structure of self-reflection, and attention to others’ mental process, — something that logical thinkers for whom the real world is “out there” (not “in here”) are not accustomed to.

 

Workshop Logistics

Preconditions: none

Participation: minimally 4, maximally 6 participants

Teaching mode: REAL-TIME DIALOGUE on Zoom

Workshop structure follows the 6 learning targets outlined above

Duration: 5 months

Session structure: weekly sessions with instructor, plus independent meetings of cohort members as needed for homework (recommended)

Number of sessions with instructor: 5×4=20 sessions of 1.5 hours duration, a total of 30 hrs

Scheduling: four 1.5 hr sessions per month allowing for holidays

Tuition: US$3,750 (US$125/hr), with US$250 discount in case of 6 sign-ups

Payment: ½ prior to start, the remainder 3 months after start

Session Mode: Zoom, with session recordings for review

Instructor Assistance: email (answers to questions, attention to personal needs)

Certification: IDM Certificate in Dialectical Thinking, Level I.

 

References to Otto Laske’s work on & with dialectical thinking since 1966:

  1. IDM Tribute of September 17, 2020: YouTube https://youtu.be/KrS2nW_AZpc
  2. Lecture on cognitive coaching based on DTF: YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By6xD8kZU_Q&feature=youtu.be
  3. Text on dialogical dialectic, “A New Approach to Dialogue: Teaching the Dialectical Thought Form Framework,” https://interdevelopmentals.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Laske-Introduction-to-the-DTF-Manual-final-version-1.pdf
  4. Frankfurt School Hauptseminar Teachings from the Perspective of DTF, https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=6763
  5. Dialectical Thought Form Manual (DTFM), https://interdevelopmentals.org/?page_id=1974 (Publications), Section C (US85.00 via Paypal).

Suggested Workshop Preparation       

  1. read “2017b introduction to DTF” found in Social Science Archive V, Section V, at https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7286
  2. attend a first zoom info session in Otto Laske’s Personal Meeting Room
  3. buy Laske’s 2015 book Dialectical Thinking for Integral Leaders: A Primer at https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=dialectical+thinking+for+integral+leaders (Amazon US$14.96)
  4. attend a 2nd info session and set a workshop start date for the study cohort
  5. pay ½ of tuition (US$1,875) prior to starting the workshop
  6. attend first workshop session.

EMAIL CONTACT: otto@interdevelopmentals.org

Filed Under: CDF Mentoring, Courses, Dialectical Thinking, education, integral thinking, meta-thinking, Workshops Tagged With: Dialectical Thinking, DTF, Otto Laske, Thought Forms

Applying Bhaskar’s Four Moments of Dialectic to Reshaping Cognitive Development as a Social Practice using Laske’s Dialectical Thought Form Framework (DTF)

July 23, 2020 By Otto Laske Leave a Comment

In this chapter for volume 2 of Meta-Theory dedicated to the memory of Bhaskar, delayed in its publication since 2014 and forthcoming at Routledge at the end of 2020,  I outline a dialectical epistemology and CDF teaching method for absorbing Bhaskar’s legacy into integral thinking. I do so since both are presently absent from the integral community’s work that has shown itself immune not only to dialectical thinking based on Baskar’s MELD itself, but also to new developments in adult-developmental theory set forth at https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7469 on this site.

In nuce, in this text I outline the IDM ‘Case Study Cohort Method’ taught since 2005 and geared to educating professionals for the sake of becoming a ‘master developmental coach or consultant’. In this chapter, I suggest that adopting this method or a suited variant of it would facilitate integral training and practical interventions in society and organizational work.

See for yourself.

Laske Chapter on Application of Bhaskar’s Meld 2020

 

Filed Under: Articles by Otto Laske, CDF Mentoring, CDF Team Typology, Consulting, Courses, Developmental Coaching, Dialectical Thinking, dialogically savvy apps, integral thinking, meta-thinking, Team Development, Uncategorized, Workshops Tagged With: CDF, Dialectical Thinking, DTF, Otto Laske, Team Development, Thought Forms

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Twitter

Otto LaskeFollow

Educated at the Frankfurt School & Kohlberg School; directs Interdevelopmental Institute (IDM); New publication "Dynamic Collaboration" with Jan De Visch 2018

Otto Laske
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
29 Dec

Architectural Work as Environment Making: Why Should Architects Acquire Tools Comprised by CDF, the Constructive Developmental Framework? https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=8159

Reply on Twitter 1476321918357811201Retweet on Twitter 1476321918357811201Like on Twitter 1476321918357811201Twitter 1476321918357811201
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
24 Dec

CDF: A Social Science Framework for Understanding Human Agency https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=8142

Reply on Twitter 1474466950080344076Retweet on Twitter 1474466950080344076Like on Twitter 14744669500803440762Twitter 1474466950080344076
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
8 Nov 2020

Get Re-socialized by Developing a Dialectical Thinking Practice https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7690 You'll find at this link a way to take a revolutionary step for the sake of self development. #IDM

Reply on Twitter 1325566371581845505Retweet on Twitter 1325566371581845505Like on Twitter 13255663715818455051Twitter 1325566371581845505
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
27 Oct 2020

From “Organizational Development” to Self-Development: An Insiders’ View of the IDM Dialectical Thinking Practicum at https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7641 is written to remind you of your responsibility for your own development that no job offer or job can be a substitute for. #IDM

Reply on Twitter 1320891694112477189Retweet on Twitter 1320891694112477189Like on Twitter 13208916941124771891Twitter 1320891694112477189
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
25 Oct 2020

The End of “Organizational Development” is the Beginning of Self-Development: An Insiders’ View of the IDM Dialectical Thinking Practicum https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7641. Have a look at why this should interest you whose skills half-life are shrinking by the day.

Reply on Twitter 1320440662236504066Retweet on Twitter 1320440662236504066Like on Twitter 1320440662236504066Twitter 1320440662236504066
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
21 Oct 2020

The half-life of your skills is rapidly shrinking. To maintain your work life, you need complex thinking to generate new skills quickly. Go to https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563 to learn about an intense dialectical thinking practicum at IDM; it's not taught at a university for sure!

Reply on Twitter 1318904448421384192Retweet on Twitter 1318904448421384192Like on Twitter 13189044484213841921Twitter 1318904448421384192
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
18 Oct 2020

Are you the best thinker you could be? Probably not. Consider learning complex, dialectical thinking in an intense practicum with Otto Laske, the originator of DTF, the Dialectical Thought Form Framework. https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563, #IDM

Reply on Twitter 1317839936935104512Retweet on Twitter 1317839936935104512Like on Twitter 1317839936935104512Twitter 1317839936935104512
Retweet on TwitterOtto Laske Retweeted
jandevischJan De Visch@jandevisch·
13 Oct 2020

Next Monday, on 19 October, at 8am (-9am) CET, I organize a free information session on the Dynamic Collaboration Webinar Series, which will be held starting in November/December.

The four two hour Deep-Dives not only inspires you to look at work in a co…https://lnkd.in/dVUb-UG

Reply on Twitter 1315924605014605826Retweet on Twitter 13159246050146058261Like on Twitter 13159246050146058262Twitter 1315924605014605826
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
13 Oct 2020

An Intense Five-Month Dialectical Thinking Practicum for Logical Thinkers https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563 Increasingly, mere logic-bound systems thinking is not good enough for dealing with 'wicked' problems. You can help yourself in this predicament by acquiring dialectical skills #IDM

Reply on Twitter 1316102279108362244Retweet on Twitter 1316102279108362244Like on Twitter 1316102279108362244Twitter 1316102279108362244
LaskeOttoOtto Laske@LaskeOtto·
12 May 2020

Check out "International Book Discovery Session ‘Practices of Dynamic Collaboration'" https://www.eventbrite.be/e/international-book-discovery-session-practices-of-dynamic-collaboration-tickets-104313668992?utm-medium=discovery&utm-campaign=social&utm-content=attendeeshare&aff=estw&utm-source=tw&utm-term=listing @Eventbrite

Reply on Twitter 1260275765406466048Retweet on Twitter 1260275765406466048Like on Twitter 12602757654064660481Twitter 1260275765406466048
Load More...

Post Archives

Post by Category

Trending topics

Active Listening Application Articles Guests Brendan Cartmel Bruno Frischherz CDF Coaching Cognitive Dimension cognitive Fluidity collaborative intelligence Course Deep Thinking Development Developmental Assessment Developmental Listening Dialectical Thinking Dialectic for Children Dialectic in the Logic of Commerce dialog DTF Executive coaching Finding Talent Free Teleseminar Green Economy Integral Integral Leadership Introduction Jan De Visch Karin Ulmer Nick Shannon Otto Laske Practical uses primer sources Psychological Profile reorganizing work self-development Shared Leadership Socio-emotional Dimension Team Coaching Team Development Text analysis Text development thinking Thought Forms Video

All Content Copyright © 2022 Otto Laske · Powered by WordPress

Posting....