Otto Laske Interdevelopmental Institute (IDM)

Creating Collaborative Intelligence

Otto Laske Interdevelopmental Institute (IDM)

Creating Collaborative Intelligence

Dialectical Thinking

IDM Practica in Dialectical Thinking

By Leave a Comment

IDM is the institution with the longest record of teaching dialectical thinking in the USA. Founded in 2000, IDM developed a now much refined curriculum for professionals of all kinds, to put to use their developmental resources for breaking the ‘logical thinking habit’, thereby moving toward a holistic and transformational way of encountering the real, social, and cultural worlds. In its newest form, IDM teaching has fully absorbed Critical Realism, with a focus on understanding and boosting human agency. Nothing boosts the latter more than having acquired a practice of dialectical thinking for structuring one’s concerns and the internal conversations needed to deal with them.

In addition to long-term case studies leading to the practice of dialectic in organizations, in 2022 IDM offers short-term, ten session Practica. These Practica are attended by up to 15 participants working together for up to 4 months, to acquire a professional grounding in the practice of dialectical thinking. Applications of this practice are found in areas such as permaculture, city planning, ecological rewilding, architectural design, art making, and others.

For more details, see The 2022 IDM Dialectics Practicum

Otto Laske Poetry Publication ‘Silesian Language Smithy’ (Schlesische Sprachschmiede) in a Bilingual Edition at Amazon

By Leave a Comment

Those who know Otto Laske as a social scientist, composer, and visual artist will be interested to see at Amazon, https://www.jpc.de/jpcng/books/detail/-/art/otto-laske-schlesische-sprachschmiede-silesian-language-smithy/hnum/10792942, that his early German poetry has appeared in a bilingual edition at Frieling Verlag, Berlin, Germany. The translation of the work into English is the author’s own; it carries the title ‘Silesian Language Smithy’. (Those who know his work more deeply realize that it is his poetry that is the foundation of much of his creative work.)

The back cover of the book states:
Otto Laske’s poems originate in a lifelong coping with experiences that led him from Silesia and Northern Germany to the United States, and from poetical to musical composition.

It is the art of composition that is evidenced by these poems which, in compact form, render the tonality and melody of his internal conversations. Over time, these internal conversations were crafted by memory into verses one will not easily forget. They speak with syntactic, gestural, and musical clarity of a life between escape and arrival. The book’s title image is taken from Laske’s digital paintings called ‘Promise’ (Versprechen) and refers to one of the poems in the book.

The three commentaries on the poetry found on the book’s back cover are as follows:

„Otto Laske opens doors not only to the literary forge where he
hammers life into verse but to the experiential crucibles where
remarkable events and responses took place. „
(Martin Ray, photographer)

„Laske’s Gedichte zeigen uns das Helle und Dunkle seiner Seele,
die Farben seiner Wortbilder, die Tonart und Melodie seiner Verse,
die durch die Kraft seines Intellekts in das gedichtete Wort
geschmiedet wurden.“
(Roland Baumgaertel, Schriftsteller)

„Laske’s poetry historically connects to Germany’s search for self-identity
after WWII; it is worth taking note of.“
(Donald Gropman, writer)

Cover_O. Laske’s Sprachschmiede,

Those interested in Otto’s visual work are invited to go to https://www.saatchiart.com/olaske. They will find 50 Collections of art work, produced since 2012.

The latest publication of his work, called ‘Condensations’, in Jaamzin Creative, Hon Kong, is found at https://www.jaamzin.com/condensations

and https://www.jaamzin.com/post/visual-artist-otto-laske-1

Toward a Critical Realist Management and Consulting Framework Based on CDF

By Leave a Comment

In this article, Otto Laske emphasizes the lack of a social ontology in present managerial and consultative thinking. Such a discipline helps social and cultural actors understand the antecedent social and cultural structures their concerns and projects are embedded in, as well as strengthen the likelihood that executing their projects will come as close as possible to the intended organizational and social results they are envisioning. Social ontology, deriving from R. Bhaskar’s and M. Archer’s work since 1980, offers managers a sense of place from which to view their meaning- and sense-making stance, not just their perceptions, from an objective place. More than that: it helps them understand “where they are positioned when they open their mouth to speak” and listen to others.

In contrast to empiricist frameworks of individual decision- making (like the Cynefin model), a social-ontology (SO) framework treats decision-making as a response of social actors to antecedent social and cultural structures they are unaware of as determinants of their project designs. Decision-making is seen as derivative of project design which in turn is conceived of as rooted in concerns linked to vested interests associated with roles in a social role matrix that is open to change by role incumbents. Rather than viewing decision-making as a starting point of adaptive functioning, such a framework treats it as the endpoint of a more or less successful journey toward understanding antecedent social and organizational constraints and enablements that human projects inevitably encounter.

Importantly, in an SO framework roles are not assigned or taken but created through a team dialogue based on complex, dialectical thinking practiced by all participants, although at different levels of cognitive development over the life span. It is the goal of real-time dialogue to witness and document that people at different levels of cognitive development conceive of social situations differently, as well as more or less adequately attuned to how they structure decision-making situations in the first place. Decision-making is seen as the origin of intended, as well as unforeseeable unintended, consequences that may run counter to the project design the decisions made sprang from.

Within an SO framework, navigating the vagaries of complex and chaotic situations is a three-phase process:

  • Phase 1: Understand the social and cultural antecedents of situations encountered which provoke project design and invite decision-making according to it.
  • Phase 2: Design and implement projects in response to such antecedents so that decisions made in executing projects are ‘in tune’ with such antecedents.
  • Phase 3: Make sure that the organizational and social structures resulting from project execution are optimally intended rather than unintended, to avoid the reproduction of, rather than achieving a transformation of, the social and cultural antecedents initially encountered.

The author sees the reason for the absence of social ontology thinking in the predominantly empiricist orientation of managers’ and consultants’ thinking for whom ‘perception’, ‘experiences’ and ‘data’ are the loadstars of their methodology  As a result, they are committing the ‘epistemic fallacy’ of reducing social reality to thought, mostly in the form of iron-clad logical models. However, social reality is not a bundle of experiences and actualities as they presume. Its enduring structures are emergent properties that are formed by social actors’ response to antecedent social and cultural structures which co-define their internal conversations about projects. Needed therefore is a re-education of both managers and consultants in the direction of becoming aware of the benefits of thinking twice, namely ontologically, that is, in terms of a pre-existing social reality they are embedded in and are responding to without being aware of it. Ontological awareness is strongly enabled by DTF, the Dialectical Thought Form Framework, that is modeled after R. Bhaskar’s Four Moments of Dialectic.

In sum: the absence from managers’ and consultants’ thinking of both adult development and social ontology (which is centered around human agency, and thus adult development) defines the double burden of their social mandate.

The article below points to a first Social Ontology Practicum that was designed to pave the way toward better informed management and consultancy thinking, and carried out in the fall of 2020 and the spring of 2021 at the Interdevelopmental Institute based on DTF.

Toward a Critical Realist Management and Consulting Framework

Steps Toward Developing a Dialectical Thinking Practice: The Structure of the IDM Dialectics Practicum

By Leave a Comment

The way we encounter the world is anchored in our ways of attending to it. They not only change the relationship we have to the world we unceasingly construct; they also fundamentally determine the world we encounter. Thinking in language when untutored in dialectical linking puts us under the control of left-hemisphere, logical, thinking, — a mode of being now rampant that constrains the quality of our life and creative work. For this reason, we are in need of re-socializing ourselves through building up in our mind new ways of listening, speaking, writing, ‘thinking’, reading, communicating, coaching, and facilitating.

To further re-socialization in adults, IDM is launching 5-months long practica of dialectical thinking.  The next Practicum starts at the end of November 2020. For details, see https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7563 and https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7641.

Since nobody can learn news ways of being from books but only through supervised practice, IDM Practica are structured in terms of a sequence of activities carried out by members of small cohorts of 4-6 participants mentored by Otto Laske, originator of the Dialectical Thought Form Framework. Have a look at the structure of the Practicum at the first link below and learn about the correspondence of Practicum Activities and Learning Targets at the second link.

Structure Proposal for Dialectics Practicum

Correspondence of Learning Activities & Targets

For viewing the Jaamzin Special Edition of Otto Laske’s dialectics-based visual artwork, go to https://issuu.com/jaamzin/docs/otto_laske. You can place an order for a copy of the print edition by transferring $35 at smediazin@gmail.com via Paypal (which includes shipping to you from an Amsterdam printer).

For additional information on the structure and flow of the Practicum, go to:

From “Organizational Development” to Self-Development: An Insiders’ View of the IDM Dialectical Thinking Practicum

An Intense Five-Month Practicum in Dialectical Thinking

 

An Intense Five-Month Practicum in Dialectical Thinking

By Leave a Comment

Increasingly, the issues on which the survival of our civilization depends are ‘wicked’ in the sense of being more complex than logical thinking alone can make sense of and deal with. Needed is not only systemic and holistic but dialectical thinking to achieve critical realism. Dialectical thinking has a long tradition both in Western and Eastern philosophy but, although renewed through the Frankfurt School and more recently Roy Bhaskar, has not yet begun to penetrate cultural discourse in a practically effective way. We can observe the absence of dialectical thinking in daily life as much as in the scientific and philosophical literature.

To begin to change this situation, Otto Laske, who comes from the Frankfurt School and has renewed dialectical thinking in Measuring Hidden Dimensions of Human Systems (2008) and Dialectical Thinking for Integral Leaders: A Primer (2015), is offering an intense practicum for thinkers and members of think tanks inside and outside of organizations, as well as members of organizations and consultants. He is using a mentoring approach in which mentees take responsibility for each other’s work as in an organizational team, offering a safe and open space in which practical as well as visionary people can come together to tackle issues of common concern that require a re-thinking of problem foundations using DTF, the Dialectical Thought Form Framework he has taught since 2000.

It is one of the benefits of the practicum to let participants viscerally experience that, and in what way, logical thinking — although a prerequisite of dialectical thinking — is potentially also the greatest hindrance to dialectical thinking because of its lack of a concept of negativity. To speak with Roy Bhaskar, dialectical thinking requires “thinking the coincidence of distinctions” that logical thinking is so good at making, being characterized by “fluidity around the hard core of absence” (that is, negativity, or what is missing or not yet there).

For thinkers unaware of the limitations of logical thinking, dialectical thinking is a many-faced beast which to tame requires building up in oneself new modes of listening, analysis, self- and other-reflection, the ability to generate thought-form based questions, and making explicit what is implicit or absent in a person’s or group’s real-time thinking. These components are best apprehended and exercised in dialogue with members of a group led by a DTF-schooled mentor/facilitator.

The complex thinking exercised in this practicum is beneficial far beyond those working in or for organizations. A wide range of professionals including members of think tanks, politicians, interdisciplinary researchers, graduate level educators, psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, social workers, life and executive coaches, and theologians equally benefit from going beyond mere logic-bounded systems thinking.

The practicum takes the following six-prong approach:

 

  Learning Targets Associated Activities
1 Foundations of Dialectic Understand moments of dialectic and classes of thought forms and their intrinsic linkages as the underpinnings of a theory of knowledge
2 Structured dialogue and communication Learn how to use moments of dialectic when trying to understand a speaker’s subject matter and issues, or when aiming to speak or writing clearly
3 (Developmental) listening and self-reflection Learn to reflect on the thought form structure of what is being said by a person or an entire group in real time
4 Text analysis Learn to understand the conceptual structure of a text (incl. an interview text) in terms of moments of dialectic and their associated thought forms as indicators of optimal thought complexity
5 Question & problem generation and formulation Learn how to formulate cogent and visionary questions (including to yourself), and give feedback based on moments of dialectic and their associated thought forms
6 Critical facilitation Learn how to assist others in understanding what they are un-reflectedly saying, thinking, or intending

Acquiring these six, mutually supportive capabilities takes time and patience with oneself and others. It goes far beyond ‘skill training’ since participants need to engage in revolutionizing their listening, way of thinking, structure of self-reflection, and attention to others’ mental process, — something that logical thinkers for whom the real world is “out there” (not “in here”) are not accustomed to.

 

Workshop Logistics

Preconditions: none

Participation: minimally 4, maximally 6 participants

Teaching mode: REAL-TIME DIALOGUE on Zoom

Workshop structure follows the 6 learning targets outlined above

Duration: 5 months

Session structure: weekly sessions with instructor, plus independent meetings of cohort members as needed for homework (recommended)

Number of sessions with instructor: 5×4=20 sessions of 1.5 hours duration, a total of 30 hrs

Scheduling: four 1.5 hr sessions per month allowing for holidays

Tuition: US$3,750 (US$125/hr), with US$250 discount in case of 6 sign-ups

Payment: ½ prior to start, the remainder 3 months after start

Session Mode: Zoom, with session recordings for review

Instructor Assistance: email (answers to questions, attention to personal needs)

Certification: IDM Certificate in Dialectical Thinking, Level I.

 

References to Otto Laske’s work on & with dialectical thinking since 1966:

  1. IDM Tribute of September 17, 2020: YouTube https://youtu.be/KrS2nW_AZpc
  2. Lecture on cognitive coaching based on DTF: YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By6xD8kZU_Q&feature=youtu.be
  3. Text on dialogical dialectic, “A New Approach to Dialogue: Teaching the Dialectical Thought Form Framework,” https://interdevelopmentals.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Laske-Introduction-to-the-DTF-Manual-final-version-1.pdf
  4. Frankfurt School Hauptseminar Teachings from the Perspective of DTF, https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=6763
  5. Dialectical Thought Form Manual (DTFM), https://interdevelopmentals.org/?page_id=1974 (Publications), Section C (US85.00 via Paypal).

Suggested Workshop Preparation       

  1. read “2017b introduction to DTF” found in Social Science Archive V, Section V, at https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=7286
  2. attend a first zoom info session in Otto Laske’s Personal Meeting Room
  3. buy Laske’s 2015 book Dialectical Thinking for Integral Leaders: A Primer at https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=dialectical+thinking+for+integral+leaders (Amazon US$14.96)
  4. attend a 2nd info session and set a workshop start date for the study cohort
  5. pay ½ of tuition (US$1,875) prior to starting the workshop
  6. attend first workshop session.

EMAIL CONTACT: otto@interdevelopmentals.org

A Guide to Listening in Meetings Based on DTF

By Leave a Comment

In this 2nd “inspiration session” regarding the book “Practices of Dynamic Collaboration”, Jan De Visch and Otto Laske focus on what DTF, the Dialectical Thought Form Framework, can teach a person or group about enlarging and deepening their ‘internal workplace’ through thought-form based listening. Thought forms are shown to be more than simply conversation starters or analytical tools for understanding conversations. Their optimal use lies in real=time listening in a group or team environment.

Thought forms are dynamic tools of dialogical thinking, in contrast to monological lists of patterns and text examples for grasping dialectic. The catch is: their use simultaneously teaches becoming aware of, and presupposes having become aware of, one’s own dialectical movements-in-thought. In short: You have to like adventures.

The set of slides below focus on team meetings (chapter 3 of the book) from the point of view of listening in real time; it teaches first steps in this direction made though text analysis of social-emotional and cognitive interviews.

Inspiration Session 2 – August 19 2020 rev. OL